The Perils of Clean Living

If you’ve met my mother you might have heard her recommend that children get outside and get in the dirt to build their immunity. Many scientists share her opinion and in medicine, the “Hygiene Hypothesis” and the “Old Friends Hypothesis” explain exactly why this might be true.

Science, like other areas of human intellectual development, tends to progress in a pendular, rather than linear fashion. Take French chemist Louis Pasteur, for example. His theories and experiments lent a ton of credence to the germ theory of disease and his discoveries saved many lives in his and future generations. Fast forward a century and we now live in a society where most people equate germs and bacteria with disease and billions of medical and personal dollars are spent fighting the nasty critters.

The Industrial Age also likely played a part, perhaps as much from moving people away from cow sheds, chicken coops and dirt roads as from the water and airborne pollutants so often blamed for health issues. We’re no longer in regular contact with the harmless microorganisms (including but not limited to helminths, lactobacilli and saprophytic mycobacteria) that have been “old friends” of humans for a very long time. It has been argued that these organisms prime immunoregulation and induce Regulatory T cells, rather than priming aggressive immune responses.

In response to this, and in an effort to stem the rapid increase in human immunoregulatory disorders like allergies, IBD and autism, a growing number of scientists and my mother have good reason to talk us down from the germ theorists’ cliff. Moreover, the hard-to-ignore convergence of two distinct areas of research – the hygiene hypothesis and the effects of pro-and prebiotics are making it increasingly obvious that we have to reconsider the human microbiome.

Two friends of mine sent me interesting emails this weekend on this topic. The first attended an apparently fascinating presentation on the human microbiome at the ACAM conference in Las Vegas and I am looking forward to hearing and sharing more details on what he heard. The second sent me two links to recent and thought-provoking articles, the first in Scientific American and the second in the New York Times. I encourage you to read both.

Sometimes a good thing can be taken too far, like when an innocent crush devolves into stalking. Yes, there are pathogens out there that will ruin your day and end your life if you’re not careful, but no, they’re not all evil. Hygiene and sanitation are good and if you look at it, the improvements in both have changed the lives of billions of people on earth for the better. But taken too far we run the risk of throwing the baby out with the bath water.

Time will tell whether or not we loose the bands of ignorance held fast by good intentions before the pendulum of our own making makes its final pass.

 “Nor had I erred in my calculations — nor had I endured in vain. I at length felt that I was free.” – Edgar Allen Poe, The Pit and the Pendulum

5 thoughts on “The Perils of Clean Living

  1. Ricardo B.'s avatar Ricardo B.

    The understanding of what an ecosystem truly means, with all of its implications, is beginning to be more fully appreciated in medicine. There are ecosystems within ecosystems, and the human body is the home for many life forms, strange as that may sound, and is an ecosystem of tremendous variability where all cooperating members have a responsibility to keep the overall organism alive and healthy.

    The doctors of the future will have to keep this in mind and will have to share an ecology mindset if a focus on health and disease prevention predominates. Great article with tons of implications!

    Like

  2. Zach's avatar Zach

    I have always been of this opinion as well. In all things, balance should rule the day, and I think that this is one of them.
    There are so many times in health that we wait too long for an issue to develop and then take a very invasive fix where if the issue had been addressed earlier, something less invasive could have been effective. This then unbalances other systems in the body, and we go for a ride on a crazy health roller coaster that usually will crash in some way or another.
    Sensitivity to how our bodies function day to day is more necessary that we think. We do not always understand all the effects of the interventions that we take to fix a problem.

    Like

  3. Joy's avatar Joy

    Great post Gregg. I appreciated the article on autism, certainly in my line of work, where we are able to decrease systemic inflammation we see wonderful improvement. Thanks!

    Like

  4. Strawberryfield's avatar Strawberryfield

    Intriguing to say the least. Our entire eco system is obviously unbalanced. I remember when the boogeyman was polio, now it seems to be autism; “black swan” episodes that leave our most precious asset, our children, at risk. Often it seems what was considered “old fashioned” or “ancient history” holds the key to a current plague. If we’ve learned anything it’s that some ideas that have stood the test of time is because they were correct to begin with. The autoimmune label has become very broad in lay articles on health. It seems so often it is the basis for a popular condition. Interesting articles, thank you.

    Like

  5. Kierney's avatar Kierney

    I can remember when good old fashioned soap was enough to clean your hands, chicken wasn’t handled with rubber gloves and e-coli wasn’t something you heard about in the news every few months. Perhaps these will continue to be concerns, but I do believe that increasing the strength of the host is what we should focus on vs. investing more in the Pasteur approach to germs.

    Like

Leave a reply to Joy Cancel reply